We should allow gay weddings in church

 
Gay Marriage. Photo: Rex Features
5 July 2012
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

The Deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, has signalled an important shift in the Government’s thinking on gay marriage. So far from church weddings for gays being excluded from the legislation, he says that religious institutions should be able to marry gay people if they wish. “I think that in exactly the same way that we shouldn’t force any church to conduct gay marriage, we shouldn’t stop any church that wants to conduct gay marriage”, he says. It is an entirely reasonable approach.

Most mainstream Christian denominations and orthodox Jews do not support gay marriage; the Anglican and Catholic churches in particular. But there are some denominations which have taken a different stance. They include the Quakers, who have a strong liberal tradition, the Unitarians and some liberal Jews. And for them it is a matter of religious liberty to be able to conduct the weddings of gay members of their congregations. They should be allowed to do so. There are, correspondingly, many gay people who would like to be able to express their faith as part of their wedding ceremony.

It remains voluntary: churches will not be obliged to celebrate gay weddings. Those denominations which are opposed in principle to gay marriage, including the Established Church, must, as Mr Clegg says, have the freedom of conscience to refuse to hold same-sex weddings. Indeed, the suggestion from Anglican bishops that the European Court of Human Rights may try to force them to do so seems purely speculative.

Mr Clegg is right to seek to extend the scope of the legislation to enable religious institutions to support same-sex marriage as well as to opt out of celebrating these weddings. Liberalism cuts both ways.

Army’s thousand cuts

We already knew the extent of planned cuts in the size of the armed services, which will reduce overall army numbers from 102,000 to 82,000, but now we know what form those cuts will take. No single regiment will be lost but individual units within regiments will be. It is a salami-slicing approach, which still hurts. Far greater emphasis will be placed on reservists to make up numbers; they will number 30,000. It is open to question whether the Territorial Army is capable of fulfilling the role the Government envisages. Besides, in hard times, employers are a good deal less open to their workforce taking time off to engage in training or operations.

These cuts will leave us with armed services which are simply incapable of fulfilling the roles they did formerly. The Foreign Secretary, William Hague, has raised the possibility of the UN Security Council authorising military intervention in Syria; after these cuts, involvements of this kind will be far harder. Prolonged deployments as in Afghanistan will be impossible.

Yet at a time when the armed services are starting to look more like a self-defence force, it is extraordinary that the Government is sticking with its plans for the renewal of the Trident nuclear system. The cost will amount to at least £20 billion. That would pay for a lot of boots on the ground. Trident is contentious at the best of times; when cuts on this scale are planned, it looks like a vanity project we can’t afford.

Cutting edge

Today the Shard is unveiled on the South Bank, the tallest structure in Europe. As architecture, it is undeniably contentious but it is already a striking feature of the London skyline. A warm welcome to our great city.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in